Zero-login demo
RedditFind 零登录 Demo 输出
这是一份公开、无需登录的官方样例输出，用来展示 RedditFind 的结果会长什么样，以及 Agent 可以如何验证每个任务的输入和输出。
这不是一个注册墙后面的抽象承诺页，而是给 Agent 和人工评估者直接查看输出形态的公开入口。
这页包含的官方样例输出
先看这四类任务，再决定是否要继续进入对应功能页或读取 JSON。
https://redditfind.ai/agent-demo机器可读 JSON: agent-demo.json
使用说明
- 这些样例来自仓库内的官方预置演示数据，用于展示结果结构，不代表实时抓取。示例内容统一展示为英文。
- 正式使用产品时仍需要登录创建任务；这个 demo 只用于零登录验证输出形态。
- 所有公开互动都需要人工审核，Demo 中的回复草稿也不例外。
输入样例
{
"goal": "Find the best Reddit communities for product validation, growth acquisition, and early community operations.",
"product": "A user research tool for indie hackers and global SaaS teams that turns Reddit threads into structured insight around pain points, demand, objections, and alternatives.",
"audience": [
"Indie makers",
"SaaS founders",
"Growth teams"
],
"constraints": [
"Focus on build-in-public, pricing, growth, and tool recommendation discussions.",
"Prefer communities with enough weekly activity to support ongoing monitoring."
],
"strategyBrief": "Use Reddit as a source for product validation, growth discovery, and community-led early traction."
}输出样例
{
"taskId": "communityDiscovery",
"taskType": "community_discovery",
"sampleInput": {
"goal": "Find the best Reddit communities for product validation, growth acquisition, and early community operations.",
"product": "A user research tool for indie hackers and global SaaS teams that turns Reddit threads into structured insight around pain points, demand, objections, and alternatives.",
"audience": [
"Indie makers",
"SaaS founders",
"Growth teams"
],
"constraints": [
"Focus on build-in-public, pricing, growth, and tool recommendation discussions.",
"Prefer communities with enough weekly activity to support ongoing monitoring."
],
"strategyBrief": "Use Reddit as a source for product validation, growth discovery, and community-led early traction."
},
"sampleOutput": {
"shortlist": [
{
"subreddit": "saas",
"score": 0.98,
"summary": "Core SaaS founder community with deep discussion about validation, pricing, go-to-market, and operator workflows.",
"fitReason": "Best overall fit. Weekly traffic and participation are both high, and the community regularly discusses pain-point discovery, validation, pricing, and tooling.",
"weeklyVisitors": "207K",
"weeklyContributions": "14K",
"representativePosts": [
{
"title": "I analyzed 9,300+ \"I wish there was an app for this\" posts on Reddit. Here is the data on what people actually want.",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1q5lfur/i_analyzed_9300_i_wish_there_was_an_app_for_this/"
},
{
"title": "Hit 1M ARR yesterday- everyone is lying to you",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/SaaS/comments/1pvx3tl/hit_1m_arr_yesterday_everyone_is_lying_to_you/"
}
]
},
{
"subreddit": "sideproject",
"score": 0.95,
"summary": "Builder showcase community where people launch MVPs, ask for feedback, and share how they ship.",
"fitReason": "Excellent for build-in-public discovery. Members are often potential users themselves, and their launch posts create strong product-validation signals.",
"weeklyVisitors": "283K",
"weeklyContributions": "9.7K",
"representativePosts": [
{
"title": "I analyzed 14 million Reddit comments to find what products people ACTUALLY recommended in 2025",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/SideProject/comments/1pxk7w3/i_analyzed_14_million_reddit_comments_to_find/"
},
{
"title": "I built a tiny site because my dad keeps sending me TikToks and I don’t want that thing on my phone.",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/SideProject/comments/1pzxgbc/i_built_a_tiny_site_because_my_dad_keeps_sending/"
}
]
},
{
"subreddit": "entrepreneurridealong",
"score": 0.92,
"summary": "Execution-focused founder community with detailed journey posts, retrospectives, and concrete operating lessons.",
"fitReason": "Useful for finding firsthand founder pain points around acquisition, tooling choices, and execution constraints.",
"weeklyVisitors": "63K",
"weeklyContributions": "2.3K",
"representativePosts": [
{
"title": "I got \"rich\" by \"accident\" (coded apps, they blew up, made money). Now AI made them useless and I am lost.",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/EntrepreneurRideAlong/comments/1qc3jtd/i_got_rich_by_accident_coded_apps_they_blew_up/"
},
{
"title": "My friend's \"boutique\" gym charges £80/session just following ChatGPT prompts (making £40k/month)",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/EntrepreneurRideAlong/comments/1q5vr55/my_friends_boutique_gym_charges_80session_just/"
}
]
}
],
"clusters": [
{
"label": "Builder core",
"operationalApproach": [
"Monitor build-in-public threads and extract the concrete tactics behind revenue milestones.",
"Collect idea-validation threads and analyze objections users raise against new products.",
"Prepare recommendation-style replies for comment threads where users ask about tech-stack choices."
],
"keyContent": [
"MRR milestone posts",
"Tech-stack discussion",
"Product launches and feedback"
],
"communities": [
{
"subreddit": "saas",
"score": 0.98,
"summary": "Core SaaS founder community with deep discussion about validation, pricing, go-to-market, and operator workflows.",
"fitReason": "Best overall fit. Weekly traffic and participation are both high, and the community regularly discusses pain-point discovery, validation, pricing, and tooling.",
"weeklyVisitors": "207K",
"weeklyContributions": "14K"
},
{
"subreddit": "micro_saas",
"score": 0.95,
"summary": "Early-stage micro SaaS community that is especially useful for validation and lightweight launch experiments.",
"fitReason": "Strong early-stage fit because the audience is tightly matched and more willing to test new products and workflows.",
"weeklyVisitors": "42K",
"weeklyContributions": "3.3K"
}
]
},
{
"label": "Growth tactics",
"operationalApproach": [
"Break down successful cold-outreach threads to extract reusable copy and structure patterns.",
"Monitor complaints about marketing tools and suggest alternatives based on the specific pain point.",
"Collect practical SEO and traffic-growth examples with concrete performance numbers."
],
"keyContent": [
"Cold outreach and outbound strategy",
"SEO experiments and traffic data",
"Marketing tool recommendations"
],
"communities": [
{
"subreddit": "growthhacking",
"score": 0.82,
"summary": "Hands-on growth community focused on acquisition experiments, channel tactics, and performance breakdowns.",
"fitReason": "Good fit for acquisition-oriented workflows because members care deeply about tools, channels, and repeatable growth tactics.",
"weeklyVisitors": "26K",
"weeklyContributions": "917"
},
{
"subreddit": "coldemail",
"score": 0.78,
"summary": "Specialist cold outreach community with highly specific operational problems and workflow details.",
"fitReason": "High signal for very specific outbound pain points such as deliverability, lead sources, and workflow quality.",
"weeklyVisitors": "16K",
"weeklyContributions": "2.5K"
}
]
}
],
"totalCandidates": 18,
"stageMessage": "Prioritize communities that combine operator-level discussion with enough weekly activity to support continuous monitoring."
}
}来自仓库内的官方预置演示快照，文本已转成英文示例，数字与链接保持真实。
输入样例
{
"subreddit": "chatgptcoding",
"objective": "Understand the community tone, rules, and high-performing discussion patterns before posting or replying."
}输出样例
{
"taskId": "communityOverview",
"taskType": "community_overview",
"sampleInput": {
"subreddit": "chatgptcoding",
"objective": "Understand the community tone, rules, and high-performing discussion patterns before posting or replying."
},
"sampleOutput": {
"about": {
"name": "ChatGPTCoding",
"title": "For The Coding Side of ChatGPT",
"subscribers": 349767,
"publicDescription": "Welcome to our community! This subreddit focuses on the coding side of ChatGPT - from interactions you've had with it, to tips on using it, to posting full blown creations! Make sure to read our rules before posting!\n"
},
"keyRules": [
{
"shortName": "Only Links to ChatGPT (and related websites) are allowed.",
"description": "Links to websites that are either not ChatGPT or not about ChatGPT are prohibited."
},
{
"shortName": "Be Civil",
"description": ""
},
{
"shortName": "Flairs are required for every post",
"description": ""
},
{
"shortName": "Discussions must be on-topic",
"description": "Posts that do not relate directly to ChatGPT or providing information of using ChatGPT will be removed."
},
{
"shortName": "Whenever possible, include the prompt the used to generate the code",
"description": ""
}
],
"hotPosts": [
{
"title": "Bifrost: A High-Performance Gateway for LLM-Powered AI Agents (50x Faster than LiteLLM)",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1omr1dw/bifrost_a_highperformance_gateway_for_llmpowered/",
"upvotes": 19,
"comments": 10
},
{
"title": "precision vibe coding",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1qhyflb/precision_vibe_coding/",
"upvotes": 1,
"comments": 1
},
{
"title": "whats the codex limits like for the pro plan of chat gpt?",
"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1qh2udm/whats_the_codex_limits_like_for_the_pro_plan_of/",
"upvotes": 12,
"comments": 16
}
],
"analysisExcerpt": "Community analysis excerpt:\n- Official positioning: a subreddit focused on the coding side of ChatGPT.\n- Real behavior: discussions already extend into broader AI engineering, agent infrastructure, ROI, and workflow design.\n- What performs well: benchmark data, practical infrastructure lessons, and nuanced discussion of cost versus productivity.\n- Participation guidance: lead with evidence, real operating detail, and technical specificity instead of generic hype.\n- One-line read: a serious builder community that has moved from code generation into production-minded AI engineering."
}
}来自仓库内的官方社区分析缓存快照，英文示例保留了真实社区资料、规则和帖子数据。
输入样例
{
"mode": "keyword + subreddit monitoring",
"keywords": [
"cursor",
"copilot",
"chatgpt coding",
"local ai coding"
],
"subreddits": [
"r/ChatGPTCoding"
],
"objective": "Continuously capture high-intent threads about tool choice, prompting workflows, and privacy constraints."
}输出样例
{
"taskId": "postMonitoring",
"taskType": "post_monitoring",
"sampleInput": {
"mode": "keyword + subreddit monitoring",
"keywords": [
"cursor",
"copilot",
"chatgpt coding",
"local ai coding"
],
"subreddits": [
"r/ChatGPTCoding"
],
"objective": "Continuously capture high-intent threads about tool choice, prompting workflows, and privacy constraints."
},
"sampleOutput": {
"queue": [
{
"subreddit": "ChatGPTCoding",
"title": "Cursor vs Copilot vs ChatGPT: what actually helps you ship faster?",
"redditUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/",
"upvotes": 312,
"intentCategory": "Tool Comparison",
"replyNeeded": true,
"replyPriority": "High",
"summary": "Users are comparing real-world productivity across Cursor, Copilot, and ChatGPT, while looking for a controllable workflow that reduces hallucinations and bug risk.",
"replyAngle": "Share a repeatable AI coding workflow and ask for the user’s stack and task mix.",
"suggestedReplyContent": "What’s helped me is treating AI like a pair-programmer with guardrails:\n\n1) Pick one “driver” tool (Cursor *or* Copilot) and use ChatGPT mainly for reasoning.\n2) Always start with a minimal repro + expected behavior.\n3) Ask for a short plan + assumptions *before* any code changes.\n4) Require a small diff/patch (no full rewrites). If it can’t do that, narrow the scope.\n5) Run tests after each step (or write a quick test first).\n\nIf you share your stack and the changes you do most (bugfix vs refactor vs new features), I can suggest a concrete prompt template + which tool tends to fit best.",
"humanReviewRequired": true
},
{
"subreddit": "ChatGPTCoding",
"title": "How do you get ChatGPT to make small diffs instead of rewriting the whole file?",
"redditUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/",
"upvotes": 268,
"intentCategory": "Prompting",
"replyNeeded": true,
"replyPriority": "Critical",
"summary": "Users want AI output that stays reviewable: small diffs and patches instead of full-file rewrites that increase review cost and hidden regressions.",
"replyAngle": "Offer a copyable prompt template that enforces constraints and diff-only output.",
"suggestedReplyContent": "Yep — you can usually fix this with “constraints + output format”. A template that works for me:\n\n**Goal:** <what you want>\n**Constraints:**\n- Only change <function/file/section>\n- Do NOT rename identifiers\n- Do NOT change formatting\n- Keep public APIs unchanged\n**Context:** <minimal relevant snippet>\n**Output:** Unified diff only (no explanations).\n\nBonus: ask it to first list the exact changes it plans to make (bullets), then output the diff. If it proposes anything too broad, narrow the scope before accepting the patch.",
"humanReviewRequired": true
},
{
"subreddit": "ChatGPTCoding",
"title": "Any privacy-friendly / local alternatives for AI coding?",
"redditUrl": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/",
"upvotes": 198,
"intentCategory": "Tooling",
"replyNeeded": true,
"replyPriority": "Medium",
"summary": "Users are looking for privacy-safe AI coding setups that balance local models, redaction, compliance, and practical day-to-day usefulness.",
"replyAngle": "Share a realistic privacy-friendly workflow and a short evaluation checklist.",
"suggestedReplyContent": "Privacy constraints are real. What’s worked for me is a hybrid approach:\n\n- Use local/on-device models for *scoped* tasks (small functions, short context): refactors, explanations, test generation.\n- Redact/minimize context aggressively (remove secrets, replace domain names, keep business logic out).\n- Keep a “review gate”: treat AI output like a PR—diffs only, tests required.\n- If you’re in a team/company, the best option is often an enterprise-approved provider that security/legal will sign off on.\n\nIf you share your language + codebase size + what tasks you want (debugging vs refactor vs tests), people can recommend a more realistic setup.",
"humanReviewRequired": true
}
],
"totals": {
"threads": 3,
"replyNeeded": 3,
"highPriority": 2
}
}
}来自仓库内的官方演示帖子数据，帖子标题去掉了中文前缀，分析文案统一展示为英文。
输入样例
{
"threads": [
"Cursor vs Copilot vs ChatGPT: what actually helps you ship faster?",
"How do you get ChatGPT to make small diffs instead of rewriting the whole file?"
],
"brandTone": "Professional, specific, and non-pushy.",
"postingGuardrail": "Human review is required before any public reply."
}输出样例
{
"taskId": "replyAssistant",
"taskType": "reply_assistant",
"sampleInput": {
"threads": [
"Cursor vs Copilot vs ChatGPT: what actually helps you ship faster?",
"How do you get ChatGPT to make small diffs instead of rewriting the whole file?"
],
"brandTone": "Professional, specific, and non-pushy.",
"postingGuardrail": "Human review is required before any public reply."
},
"sampleOutput": {
"replyQueue": [
{
"subreddit": "ChatGPTCoding",
"title": "Cursor vs Copilot vs ChatGPT: what actually helps you ship faster?",
"replyPriority": "High",
"replyAngle": "Share a repeatable AI coding workflow and ask for the user’s stack and task mix.",
"suggestedReplyContent": "What’s helped me is treating AI like a pair-programmer with guardrails:\n\n1) Pick one “driver” tool (Cursor *or* Copilot) and use ChatGPT mainly for reasoning.\n2) Always start with a minimal repro + expected behavior.\n3) Ask for a short plan + assumptions *before* any code changes.\n4) Require a small diff/patch (no full rewrites). If it can’t do that, narrow the scope.\n5) Run tests after each step (or write a quick test first).\n\nIf you share your stack and the changes you do most (bugfix vs refactor vs new features), I can suggest a concrete prompt template + which tool tends to fit best.",
"humanReviewRequired": true
},
{
"subreddit": "ChatGPTCoding",
"title": "How do you get ChatGPT to make small diffs instead of rewriting the whole file?",
"replyPriority": "Critical",
"replyAngle": "Offer a copyable prompt template that enforces constraints and diff-only output.",
"suggestedReplyContent": "Yep — you can usually fix this with “constraints + output format”. A template that works for me:\n\n**Goal:** <what you want>\n**Constraints:**\n- Only change <function/file/section>\n- Do NOT rename identifiers\n- Do NOT change formatting\n- Keep public APIs unchanged\n**Context:** <minimal relevant snippet>\n**Output:** Unified diff only (no explanations).\n\nBonus: ask it to first list the exact changes it plans to make (bullets), then output the diff. If it proposes anything too broad, narrow the scope before accepting the patch.",
"humanReviewRequired": true
}
],
"workflow": {
"replyNeededCount": 2,
"humanReviewRequired": true,
"publishAutomatically": false
}
}
}来自仓库内的官方演示回复草稿，示例内容统一展示为英文，并保留真实优先级与草稿结构。